
Optimizing an Amazon listing for Rufus is the process of structuring your product information - across titles, bullet points, descriptions, images, A+ Content, and Q&A - so that Amazon's AI shopping assistant can accurately interpret, recommend, and surface your product in response to natural-language shopper queries. This is not a minor update to existing SEO practices. It is a fundamentally different discipline: where A9 optimization rewarded keyword relevance among many ranking signals, Rufus optimization rewards contextual clarity, completeness, and the structured communication of product truth.
The stakes are concrete. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy disclosed during the Q3 2025 earnings call that Rufus had reached 250 million active customers, with interactions up 210% year over year. Shoppers who engage Rufus during a session are 60% more likely to complete a purchase. Amazon subsequently confirmed in its Q4 2025 earnings that Rufus surpassed 300 million users and generated nearly $12 billion in incremental annualized sales during 2025 - exceeding its own earlier $10 billion projection. Meanwhile, Adobe Analytics data shows AI-driven traffic to U.S. retail sites surged 693% year over year during the 2025 holiday season, with consumers arriving from AI sources converting 31% more than those from traditional channels.
This is no longer emerging. It is the new architecture of Amazon product discovery, and it demands a new discipline - what we at ZonGuru call Listing Engineering.
This guide breaks down each optimization lever with specific, implementable tactics. Where a recommendation is backed by Amazon's own data or published research, we say so. Where it reflects industry best practice based on practitioner testing and logical inference, we say that too. The distinction matters because Rufus is a closed system - Amazon has not published an optimization playbook - and sellers deserve to know which advice rests on verified ground and which rests on informed reasoning.
Amazon Rufus is a generative AI shopping assistant embedded across the Amazon mobile app, desktop, and product detail pages. According to Amazon's official announcement, Rufus was trained on Amazon's product catalogue, customer reviews, community Q&A, and information from across the web. Amazon has not publicly disclosed which specific large language models power Rufus, though it is built within Amazon's broader AI infrastructure.
Rufus launched in U.S. beta in February 2024 and expanded to all U.S. customers in July 2024, followed by rollout to the UK, India, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and Canada. Since launch, Amazon has shipped over 50 technical upgrades, transforming Rufus from a question-answering tool into an agentic shopping system with account memory, price tracking, auto-buy capabilities, and the "Help Me Decide" feature (launched October 2025), which recommends specific products with explanations drawn from listing data, reviews, and shopper history.
For sellers, the critical shift is this: Rufus does not simply match keywords. It reads your listing, interprets what your product is and who it serves, synthesises information from reviews and Q&A, and decides whether to recommend your product in a conversation. Your listing is no longer just a keyword container. It is a knowledge document that an AI evaluates for relevance, completeness, and trustworthiness.
Rufus draws on multiple systems to decide which products to recommend. One of the most important is COSMO (COmmon Sense MOdeling), Amazon's commonsense knowledge graph system that maps products to real-world human intent. COSMO was published as a peer-reviewed paper at ACM SIGMOD 2024 and detailed in an Amazon Science blog post.
It is important to understand how COSMO actually works, because much of the advice circulating in the seller community misrepresents the mechanism.
COSMO builds its knowledge graph by analysing real customer behaviour - specifically, query-purchase pairs (what people search for and then buy) and co-purchase data (what products people buy together in the same session). It uses large language models to infer the commonsense relationships behind those behaviour patterns, then validates those inferences through human-in-the-loop annotation. The result is a knowledge graph spanning 18 major product categories with millions of knowledge assertions, using relationship types such as used_for_audience, used_for_activity, capable_of, and used_with.
The Amazon Science blog illustrates this with a concrete example: when customers searching for "shoes for pregnant women" frequently purchase slip-resistant shoes, COSMO infers the commonsense relationship <pregnant women, require, slip-resistant> - without that relationship being explicitly stated in any listing.
In Amazon's own experiments, adding COSMO knowledge to a search relevance model produced a 60% increase in Macro F1 score when using frozen encoders (a controlled experimental condition). With fine-tuned encoders, the COSMO-enhanced model still outperformed baselines by 22-28%.
Why this matters for your listing strategy: COSMO does not read your listing text and create knowledge nodes from it. It learns from the aggregate purchase behaviour of millions of shoppers. But your listing content shapes that behaviour. A listing that clearly communicates who the product serves, what problems it solves, and what it is compatible with helps shoppers make confident purchase decisions - and those confident purchases generate the behavioural signals COSMO learns from. The effect is real, but the path is indirect: better listing content → better-informed purchases → stronger COSMO knowledge associations about your product.
Amazon has not officially confirmed that COSMO powers Rufus directly, but this connection is the widely-held understanding across the seller community, supported by practitioners who have analysed Amazon's patent filings and observed Rufus's behaviour patterns. We treat this connection as probable throughout this guide.
Keyword optimization alone is no longer enough because Amazon's discovery system is shifting from pure keyword matching toward intent understanding. Where A9 primarily asks "does this listing contain the words the customer searched for?", systems like COSMO enable Amazon to ask "does this product solve the problem the customer described?"
Consider the difference in practice. A shopper types into Rufus: "I need a quiet vacuum for a small apartment with a shedding dog." Under a pure keyword-matching system, the algorithm scans listings for those keyword combinations. Under an intent-matching system informed by commonsense knowledge, the query maps to intent nodes - noise level, compact form factor, pet hair capability, filtration quality - and the system evaluates which products satisfy those needs.
A listing that says "powerful suction for pet hair" conveys one data point. A listing that says "58 dB noise level - quieter than a conversation - with HEPA H13 filtration that captures 99.97% of pet dander, designed for spaces under 800 sq ft" conveys four specific, verifiable attributes that directly answer what the shopper is looking for.
This distinction matters because many sellers - and many AI copywriting tools - still operate within the keyword paradigm. Using ChatGPT or another generative AI to rewrite your listing produces fluent marketing copy, but fluent copy is not structured product knowledge. Prompts do not create systems. Winning AI discovery requires engineered product knowledge - not better prompts.
Keywords still matter for A9 indexing (covered later in this guide), but the listings that perform best as Rufus adoption grows will be those built on specificity, structure, and contextual completeness.
Rewriting your product title for Rufus requires leading with the high-intent solution and primary use case, because Rufus processes titles to understand what the product does and who it serves - not simply to match keyword strings.
Rufus's chat interface occupies significant screen space on mobile, which means titles are truncated earlier than in traditional search results. Best practice is to ensure the first 80 characters carry the core meaning of your product.
The old A9 formula prioritised brand and exact-match keywords:
BrandName Premium Stainless Steel Garlic Press - Heavy Duty Professional Grade Kitchen Tool
A Rufus-conscious title leads with category, benefit, and use context:
Garlic Press, Easy-Squeeze & Self-Cleaning, Rust-Proof Stainless Steel - Dishwasher Safe for Home & Professional Kitchens
The second version communicates three things an intent-matching system needs: what the product is (garlic press), what problem it solves (easy squeeze, self-cleaning), and who it serves (home and professional kitchens). These map directly to the kinds of used_for_activity and used_for_audience relationships COSMO encodes.
Title best practices for Rufus compatibility:
Bullet points should be written as self-contained benefit statements that each answer a specific customer question. Practitioner testing consistently shows that Rufus cites specific bullet content when generating conversational responses, which means each bullet functions as a potential data source the AI can reference.
A9-era bullet (keyword-focused):
DURABLE CONSTRUCTION - Made with premium heavy-duty stainless steel material for long lasting durability and performance, high quality kitchen gadget tool accessory
Listing-Engineered bullet (structured product knowledge):
BUILT TO LAST - Constructed from 18/10 stainless steel (the same grade used in commercial kitchens), this garlic press withstands 20,000+ squeeze cycles without warping. Dishwasher safe on the top rack.
The second version provides three specific, verifiable data points: the steel grade (18/10), a durability metric (20,000 cycles), and a care instruction (dishwasher safe, top rack). When a shopper asks Rufus "is this garlic press durable?", the AI can pull a confident, specific answer directly from that bullet.
Best practice: apply a question-answering framework across all five bullets:
Images are increasingly important in Rufus optimization because Amazon's AI capabilities are multimodal - meaning the system can process visual content, not just text. Analysis of Amazon's patent filings (documented extensively by Seller Sessions) indicates that Rufus uses optical character recognition (OCR) to read text embedded in product images and computer vision to interpret visual content. Amazon has not officially confirmed these capabilities for Rufus in production, but practitioner testing is consistent with the patent descriptions.
If Rufus reads image text via OCR (as patent analysis suggests): An infographic that says "Holds 64 oz - Fits Standard Cup Holders" would provide the system with specific attribute data it can map to queries like "large water bottle that fits in my car." This makes informational text overlays on images a potentially valuable optimization lever.
A+ Content alt text is likely a data input. Since Rufus is trained on Amazon's product catalogue data, descriptive alt text plausibly feeds contextual information to the system. Best practice is to write context-rich alt text rather than generic labels.
The context-rich version communicates use cases (green smoothies, ice crushing, frozen fruit) and product features (tamper tool, 1200 watts) that map to the kinds of shopper queries Rufus handles.
Image best practices for Rufus visibility:
Optimising your product description for Rufus means using the full 2,000-character limit to add contextual information that does not appear in your title or bullet points. Since Amazon confirms Rufus is trained on the product catalogue, the description is part of the data set the AI draws from.
The description should not repeat bullet points. It should expand on secondary use cases, explain the reasoning behind product design decisions, and address common purchase objections. Write in natural, benefit-focused language - the way you would explain the product to a knowledgeable buyer, not the way you would stuff a keyword index.
Effective description structure (best practice):
The Customer Questions & Answers section is one of the most underrated and valuable Rufus optimization levers available. This is a verified observation, not a best-practice guess - Rufus demonstrably cites Q&A content when generating responses. Practitioners consistently observe Rufus referencing answers with phrasing like "According to customer answers, this product…" or "Customers report that this item…"
This makes Q&A a direct input into Rufus's responses - and one of the few areas where sellers can proactively add information that the AI surfaces, without modifying the product itself.
The strategic approach is to seed the Q&A section with specific, truthful queries that your standard copy cannot address naturally.
Examples of high-value Q&A entries to seed:
Each answer provides specific, verifiable details. The fishing reel answer communicates a used_for_activity → saltwater fishing relationship - exactly the type of intent knowledge that COSMO encodes from purchase behaviour. When enough shoppers find and buy your product after asking similar questions, that relationship strengthens in Amazon's recommendation systems.
Customer reviews are a confirmed data source for Rufus - Amazon states Rufus is trained on customer reviews, and the AI demonstrably synthesises review sentiment into natural-language summaries when generating responses.
How heavily Rufus weighs reviews relative to listing copy is not publicly known. But what is observable is that Rufus frequently cites review language when making recommendations, and negative review clusters on specific attributes surface as concerns in Rufus's responses. This makes reviews a high-impact factor regardless of the exact internal weighting.
You cannot edit reviews, but you can influence the review ecosystem through three levers:
1. Monitor review language and let it inform your listing. Reviews are a data source. When customers consistently describe your product using specific language — "great for side sleepers," "runs small," "surprisingly lightweight" — that language reflects how real buyers understand your product. Rufus is trained on this review corpus alongside your listing. Aligning your copy with the language customers actually use creates consistency between the two sources Rufus draws from, rather than contradiction.
2. Address negative review themes in your listing. When Rufus encounters a pattern of negative reviews about a specific issue, it surfaces that concern in its responses. Proactively addressing known issues - in your Q&A, A+ Content, or description - creates counter-information Rufus can reference.
3. Calibrate listing claims to match actual review language. If your bullets say "whisper-quiet motor" but reviews consistently describe the product as "not silent but reasonably quiet," Rufus will surface the review language. Audit your reviews for the real language customers use, then align your listing copy with verified reality. Over-promising relative to review evidence actively undermines your credibility with an AI trained on both sources.
COSMO is the intelligence layer that gives Amazon's search and recommendation systems an understanding of human intent beyond keywords. Understanding how COSMO works - and, critically, how it does not work - shapes every aspect of listing strategy.
The COSMO research paper (ACM SIGMOD 2024) documents five primary relationship types in the knowledge graph:
COSMO Relationship Example/Strategic Implication
used_for_activity: Trail running shoes → trail running (Name the specific activities your product serves)
used_for_audience: Slip-resistant shoes → pregnant women (Name the target audience explicitly)
used_with: Blender → frozen fruit, ice (List compatible inputs and accessories)
capable_of: Headlamp → increasing visibility to motorists (Describe functional capabilities, not just features)
used_for_event: Formal shoes → wedding (Name the occasions and contexts)
The strategic implication is not that COSMO reads these phrases from your listing and creates nodes (it does not - see the earlier section on how COSMO actually works). The implication is that these are the categories of knowledge Amazon's systems are designed to understand. When your listing clearly communicates this information, two things happen: shoppers understand your product better (improving conversion), and the resulting purchase behaviour generates stronger signals in Amazon's knowledge systems.
This is the principle behind ZonGuru's Listing Engineering approach: every listing is treated as a structured product knowledge system - ingesting product truth, analysing the niche for intent pathways and competitive gaps, mapping attributes to the relationship categories Amazon's systems are designed to understand, validating through seller feedback loops, and engineering the final output for both AI readability and human conversion. The result is not AI-generated copy. It is engineered product knowledge.
Yes - A9 keyword optimization remains essential because Rufus and traditional search operate in parallel, not as replacements. As of early 2026, Rufus-mediated sessions represent a growing but still minority share of total Amazon shopping activity. The majority of purchases still flow through keyword-based search.
The same listing content feeds both systems. What changes is how you think about structuring that content.
The layered strategy:
Think of it as dual optimization: write for the AI reader first - clear, specific, contextual - and the keyword coverage follows. The reverse does not work: keyword-first copy produces incoherent text that any language model could evaluate as low-quality evidence.
A+ Content is part of the product catalogue data that Amazon uses to train Rufus, which makes it a plausible input to the AI's understanding of your product. While Amazon has not confirmed the specific weight A+ Content carries in Rufus's recommendation logic, optimising it for AI readability is a low-risk, high-potential-upside investment.
A+ best practices for Rufus optimisation:
Avoid using A+ Content as a purely visual brochure. To the extent Rufus processes A+ Content, it needs readable text - either in copy blocks or potentially embedded in images via OCR - to extract product knowledge.
Testing Rufus optimization requires querying Rufus directly with the natural-language questions your target customers would ask, then evaluating whether your product appears and whether the information presented is accurate.
Testing workflow:
If Rufus does not mention your product for relevant queries, the most common causes are: insufficient contextual detail (Rufus cannot match what it cannot understand), poor review sentiment on the queried attribute, or category misalignment.
For sellers who want a systematic assessment rather than manual testing, ZonGuru offers a free COSMO/Rufus Readiness Report that scores your listing across the dimensions that align with how Amazon's AI systems evaluate product data - providing a structured baseline before optimisation begins.
The three most damaging mistakes are keyword stuffing, making unanchored benefit claims, and neglecting non-text content - each of which undermines how effectively Amazon's AI systems can understand and recommend your product.
Mistake 1 - Keyword stuffing. Any language model, Rufus included, evaluates semantic coherence. A bullet that reads "yoga mat non-slip yoga mat for hot yoga pilates exercise mat thick yoga mat" provides near-zero useful information. No AI system can extract meaningful knowledge from incoherent text, and this approach hurts readability for human shoppers as well.
Mistake 2 - Unanchored benefit claims. Phrases like "premium quality," "best in class," and "superior performance" contain no specific attributes, no measurable claims, and no contextual information. They add nothing that an AI system can anchor to when answering a shopper's question. Replace every subjective adjective with a verifiable fact: "premium quality" becomes "medical-grade 304 stainless steel"; "superior performance" becomes "processes 48 oz of frozen fruit in 45 seconds."
Mistake 3 - Neglecting images and non-text content. Amazon's AI capabilities are multimodal, and patent analysis strongly suggests Rufus processes image content. Sellers who invest exclusively in copy optimization while uploading generic white-background photos are potentially leaving one of the most important data channels unaddressed.
Use this checklist to audit any listing for Rufus readiness. Items marked with ✅ are confirmed best practices. Items marked with 🔶 reflect practitioner-tested recommendations based on observed Rufus behaviour and patent analysis.
Title
Bullet Points
Product Description
Images
Q&A Section
A+ Content
Reviews
Optimizing Amazon listings for Rufus is not a tactical update to existing SEO practices. It is a structural shift in how listings must be conceived, written, and maintained.
The verified data is unambiguous. Rufus has surpassed 300 million users (Amazon Q4 2025 earnings). It generated $12 billion in incremental sales in 2025. Shoppers who engage it are 60% more likely to buy (Amazon Q3 2025 earnings call). AI-driven traffic to retail sites surged 693% year over year during the 2025 holiday season (Adobe Analytics). This channel is not emerging. It is here.
The sellers who compound growth as Rufus adoption scales are those who treat their listings as structured product knowledge systems - not keyword containers. Every tactic in this guide - from title restructuring to Q&A seeding to image alt text - serves a single principle: communicate what your product is, who it serves, and what problems it solves with enough specificity and structure that both AI and human shoppers can confidently choose it.
This is the discipline ZonGuru calls Listing Engineering. It is the process of engineering structured product knowledge through deep research, validation, and repeatable mapping to the intent relationships Amazon's systems are designed to understand - built for AI discoverability and human conversion. For sellers ready to move beyond keyword-era optimisation, our COSMO Transformation Service delivers this as a done-for-you solution: AI-mapped copy, technical scoring with before/after analysis, image audit, and ready-to-upload deliverables.
The algorithm is not the enemy. It is trying to match real customer needs with real solutions. Your job is to make those connections clear. Start with the checklist. Test with Rufus. Engineer the knowledge. The AI will do the rest.
Discover opportunities. Maximize your sales. Grow your Amazon business!
Get started with ZonGuru, access all the tools with a FREE trial.
Start FREE TrialAmazon’s Algo Has Changed. Get Your Listings AI-Mapped.
Claim Limited Offer